Reimbursement changes with new PCI codes in 2013.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will reduce payment for coronary stenting on January 1, 2013. That is the bad news. More on that later. Is there any good news? Yes. First, CMS could have cut payments for coronary stenting 10 or more years ago, but it did not. Second, coronary stenting has been reimbursed for the past 17 years at a rate that was set in 1994. To appreciate that, one has to remember that 1994 was the year the STRESS [1] and BENESTENT [2] studies compared elective stenting to balloon angioplasty, and a randomized trial published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions compared then the state-of-the-art Palmaz-Schatz and Gianturco-Roubin II stents [3]. Elective stenting was just starting; most stents were placed to bail out failed balloon angioplasty. 1994 was also the year that CMS determined how much it would pay physicians to perform coronary stenting. The expert panel that advised CMS on reimbursement estimated that the average stenting procedure required 120 min of physician time from first injection of lidocaine to last catheter withdrawn, diagnostic catheterization not included. The expert panel also estimated that coronary stenting required 45 min of preparation time before the procedure and 60 min of physician work after the procedure, for a total physician work time of 225 min per coronary stenting case. Interventionalists have been paid at a rate based on about 4 hr per procedure for the past 17 years.
منابع مشابه
Temporal Trends in the Risk Profile of Patients Undergoing Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's CathPCI Registry.
BACKGROUND Because of recent changes in criteria for coverage for inpatient hospital stays, most nonacute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures are reimbursed on an outpatient basis regardless of underlying patient risk. Downstream effects of these changes on the risk profile of patients undergoing outpatient PCI have not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS Using the American Co...
متن کاملDynamic changes in purine catabolism in patients with acute coronary syndrome that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention
Background: Cardiovascular diseases are global problems. They are causes of death in about 43% of people worldwide and may become the most widespread reason of death by 2020. The prognosis is directly dependent to immediate diagnosis and on time treatment. Introduction of new biochemical markers as the early diagnosis of complications after coronary revascularization is very important in this p...
متن کاملAn Investigation into Kefa’at in Religion from the Perspective of the Quran, Narrations, Islamic Jurisprudence and Law With an Emphasis on Islamic Penal Codes of 1991 and 2013
The Islamic Penal Code adopted in 2013 on the issue of the kefa’at (sufficiency of reasons) of murderer and the murdered in religion has undergone some changes in comparison to the Islamic Penal Code of 2001. The legislator's approach in the new law is to remove the ambiguities of the former one about the issue in question and, therefore, in Articles 301, 310 and 311 of the new law, many of the...
متن کاملThe Impact of the Clinical Miscoding on Inpatient Reimbursement
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of coding errors and its effect on the amount of correct reimbursement to patients. Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed in 2018. Research resources were records in compensation units in medical documents center of social security organization. A total of 546 re...
متن کاملInpatient or Outpatient Status for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Doctor, "You Gotta Let Me Know, Should I Stay or Should I Go?".
Doctor, “you gotta let me know. Should I stay or should I go?” This (modified) version of The Clash’s song is a fundamental question for physicians and patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the current paradigm, third-party payers dictate that the vast majority of patients irrespective of risk should go. The driving force behind this is almost entirely financial. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
دوره 80 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012